Monday 19 January 2009

MORE PROOF OF WHITE'S LIES!

White alleges he was raided by West Yorkshire Police on the 1st October 2008.  He further alleges the Police spent fourteen hours searching his property and seized a firearm (a stun gun). This all took place, he was allegedly detained and released that evening despite him being on licence until January.  The following were taken from the C18 Guestbook in the days proceeding this fictional raid and checks at the time confirmed Stuart Hollingdale posted the first one, White the second.

“A well known NF activist ,BPP supporter and RVF volunteer has been arrested yet again for possession of racially inflammatory material. This appears to be a witch hunt against anyone bringing unity and is aimed at those high profile activists doing so,so beware people they're at it again and from what I'm hearing the details given were within a select few. This is what the purveyors of unity get when they try to unite us! The Hotline number or contact number for this person is now in the hands of the state but other contacts are still functional. Further details as we get them.” 

"Subsequent to a request from his family, the following statement is issued to all interested persons: Yorkshire NF Organiser Tony White, was arrested yesterday (1st.Oct.08) for posession of racially inflammatory materials. Given the current climate of back-stabbing and stirring, this came as no surprise to him or his family, as it is his third arrest for the same type of offence. It is also correct to assume that it was an intelligence led operation to arrest him and that the specific information was only known by three people..”

These statements raise some interesting points; White's contribution (the second one) clearly says he is the Yorkshire NF organiser yet the NF have since issued a proscription notice (the Jan bulletin) and prior to this various representatives from the Party stated White was not a NF member, was certainly not their organiser and had not been a member for SEVEN YEARS. He spent a good couple of months issuing all sorts of 'official' NF statements that it seems (and as we stated at the time) were pure fabrications.  This is conclusive proof that White lied for months about being the NF organiser or even a member.  

More interesting is the matter of the alleged raid and what was seized if White is to be believed - and he isn't.  First of all, White was out on licence until January 2009 and the raid took place in October 2008 so this Parole Licence WAS valid.  Had White been raided as he alleges that Parole Licence would have instantly been revoked and he'd have been locked up for at least 28 days. This happens without exception - see the www.paroleboard.gov.uk site for confirmation of this.  Secondly, he says a stun gun was seized, and under current legislation a taser or stun gun is a prohibited item under the Firearms Act 1968 Section 5, 1A, under this legislation a landmark legal case (Flack v Baldry 1988) saw The House of Lords declare that held electricity to be a noxious thing in view of its stunning effect on its victims) and continues to be so even if it is not working. 

So... White ALLEGES he was raided and a prohibited item under the Firearms Act 1968 was seized during a fourteen hour search, then within twenty four hours he is simply released by the Police because they tell him there is a safety zone on his licence.  The Parole Board website confirms quite clearly that anyone committing ANY offence whilst out on Parole Licence will be recalled for a minimum of 28 days and the Statute Law website confirms that possession of a firearm is illegal so why oh why did White not see his licence instantly revoked?  When I questioned White about this he alleged the Police told him that his licence had a safety buffer zone yet extensive searches have not yielded a single mention of this and anyone questioned who has similarly been out on licence has ever heard of it. Essentially, any Parole Licence is valid for a stated period of time (usually until the date the custodial sentence would have expired) and ANY contravention of its strict parameters will result in its instant revocation for a minimum of 28 days.  

From this research we are left with prodigious inconsistencies which include:

*Why did White NOT have his Parole Licence revoked when a stun gun (firearm) was seized?

*Why can White not produce Charge Sheets from the raid or any of the paperwork relating to the time the Police allegedly entered and left the house?  The paperwork he has thus far produced is clearly fake as it contains one fundamental error, it is my belief that he doctored his paperwork from his arrest a couple of years earlier - certainly the Warrant lists EXACTLY the same ones as the earlier ones do and I do not believe in coincidences.  Why won't White produce BOTH warrants to dispel this?

*Why did White tell people (Wigan Mike for one) that during this raid the Police left a folder there which stated that if Mike attended the Leeds demo he would get nicked and sent down for three years.  White denies this now yet he told Kate, Ed S, KW and witnesses have confirmed that he rang Wigan Mike and told him this tale too.  It was this little lie that prevented the BFF and RVF from attending the BPP demo on the 18th.  

*Why was White masquerading as an NF organiser and making statements on their behalf about this raid when he was NOT even a member of the NF?

*Why did a witness living in the vicinity of White's house say that Police were not present during any part of the day he alleges the raid took place? 

 
These are just a few of the crucial inconsistencies surrounding this alleged raid.  I am in the process of making extensive checks which will either confirm the raid took place or White is once again lying - I will post the findings as soon as they become available but in the meantime I suggest that anyone who has the slightest doubt about White read the above very carefully.  Tony White is a liar and those who are unable to see this are either deluded, retarded or the glint from their free statue is blinding them to the harsh reality that White is a grass.  

13 comments:

Anonymous said...

Forget him being on license. With his record and the fact that he is such a "high-profile active Nationalist" who the Police would just love to get hold of, he would have gone straight to Magistrates Court the next day & the CPS would've opposed bail & he would've been remanded in custody. Unless of course it didn't happen or unless it did and his SB handlers intervened.

Anonymous said...

Precisely - it stinks. The paperwork White has scanned and emailed is conveniently missing vital parts because he says it was too big a file to scan! This is more rubbish. The reason for the warrant miraculously matches letter for letter those that appeared on his raid and arrest a couple of years earlier! And White so far has refused to provide scans of BOTH raids... I believe that he has used the old warrants to make them look newer. The checks should soon yield their results and will be proof that he is a liar. I can not believe people believe his shit. Unbelievable.

Anonymous said...

The reason they don't believe is because they don't want to. To do so would involve admitting they have been duped. It's a bit like the wife that knows her husband is cheating - all the signs are there but as an emotional defence mechanism she subconciously conditions herself to believe the exact opposite.

Anonymous said...

to recieve parole it has to be a sentence of two years and over.parole is when you have served one third of your sentence you have a parole hearing.anything under two years you serve half i bleieved it was halved in 88 89 as i was in custody at the time.how long was whites sentence?

Anonymous said...

I am under the impression that anything up to four years is automatically halved (but I could be wrong). I don't know the length of White's last sentence, but even if he were released half-way, it would've been on license. Parole is also a form of licensed release, only with stricter conditions imposed ie a visit to the parole officer on a weekly basis. Either way you look at it White would've had conditions to his release and a raid in which a firearm was found (even a stungun which is near the bottom of the scale for firearms) or indeed items that contravene certain race acts (the charge he was actually originally found guilty of before his release) most certainly would have seen him recalled to serve the rest of his sentence, and if the sentence ended before the Court case for the new charge, then he would've been denied bail and moved straight to the remand wing, would he not?

Anonymous said...

I was raided twice last year. Once by loal Police & a few weeks later by Special Branch. The first raid only took about 20 minutes and they were looking for rascist literature in multple items. The second time it was for the same thing only 3 Special Branch coppers. They spent around 3 and a half hours on the search. White says they wee in his place for 14 hours. Does he live in a Mansion???

Anonymous said...

i suppose he would be with the severity of a stun gun and race related material as you say he had.maybe it is four years as i know it was changed again to empty the prisons.due to prison being rammed to the hilt.

i,m concerned with other people being called grasses were the seems to no documented proof of this do you think this is a sillt thing to do and good back fire?

if you do not like someone by all means state that but not calling people grasses if it aint true this is not in relation to white lies it,s the others been named on this blog.

personally i don,t see it doing your case any good.

Anonymous said...

Which comments are you referring to? I have only accused two people of being wrong-uns - White & Newark. If you are referring to the comments that Joe Owens made then the reason they were publuished is due to the respect he has in certain spheres of the Nationalist Movement and let's not forget he has stated previously that I too am a grass! And anyway, it would've been rude not to publish them. In the event I don't know if the accusations against those people are true or not. I will say that as stated before, Reaction65 is a good friend and Comrade and I believe he is 100% ok. The others i have only met a maximum of twice so who knows? I would hope not.

Anonymous said...

@es sorry don,t mean you personally should have phrased it better i mean mk geezer and another.i think allowing this on is causing rumours i don,t mean by you personally but allowing it may cast doubt in certain minds.

Anonymous said...

Yes, you are absolutely right. The reason we allowed comments about others is so we would not be accused of censorship (although sme comments insulting mods on this blog have not been published). In future we will try to keep it just for Tony & Alan.

Anonymous said...

All ex-prisoners whose sentences were 12 months or over are under a firearms ban (which even includes air-pistols and replicas) for 5 years. Those ex-prisoners who received sentences of 3 years or over have lifetime firearms bans. For TW to be arrested for having a stun gun and released on bail he has to be a wrong un. Or he has made the whole thing up.

The Exposer! said...

Yeah, you are right. In around 1995 or 96, I was arrested for something I will not go into here. My home was searched & in a work jacket (I was working as a nightclub doorman at the time) was found a can of CS gas. i was charged & took it to Crown Court. I had previously served a 5 year sentence for violence and therefore, as you say could not even touch an airgun. However, my defence was that I had confiscated the gas at work while carrying out a search, which was a condition of entry at the club I was working, and had forgotten I had the can on me (and of course, it was my intention to hand the can in to the Police). The licensee of the premesis gave evidence to say I had drawn his attention to the confiscation & that he'd told me to hand it in on my way home. The case was thrown out, but because of my previous convictions, I was still given a conditional dischrage. A stungun is looked on as a lot more serious, White had not been long out of Prison and was on license. WHY WASN'T HE BANGED STRAIGHT BACK UP????

The Exposer! said...

White told me the stun gun was concealed as a torch - a disguised weapon carries an even heftier sentence so WHY was his licence not instantly revoked? Why was he not nicked straight away based on what has been stated in the above two entries?

Might it be because White Lies?

I applied under the Freedom Of INformation Act to find out if any raids took place in the area White lives in where a stun gun was seized - they have twenty days to reply and haven't. I wonder why?

Might it be because West Yorkshire Police are paying White's wages and concealing the fact? I will be ringing them tomorrow and every single day until they acknowledge this.